Call me a cynic but aren’t a huge chunk of the legal opinions written in this country essentially “derivative works” based on other peoples arguments and analysis? Don’t judges (or their clerks) take whole paragraphs from briefs and drop them into opinions? Don’t lawyer’s draft briefs selecting text from judicial opinions and legal memoranda?
Is the whole system of common law precedent to be pulled from Lexis and Westlaw and put through a textual analysis to see who had the first “original expression” of various issues?
Wait I have a better idea, Lexis and Westlaw can take the plaintiff’s briefs and run them through a textual analysis – the kind they use to detect plagiarism in college term papers. It will be interesting to see where the plaintiff’s may have derived their briefs from.
Thanks to Patricia Barbone for tipping me off to this filing.