colleague Ron Friedmann @ronfriedmann posted an interesting question on his blog Prism Legal today. He is collecting “crowd sourced” questions
which he can ask at this week’s IBM’s World of Watson conference. I am fully booked, so I can’t attend, but I have a question for Ron to ask on my
behalf: “Can Watson ask questions?”
Answers are Easy— Questions are The Sign of a Pro!
The test of Watson as a
legal researcher will not be whether it can provide a generic legal answer but whether it can ask the necessary series of narrowing
questions to help a lawyer define the answer that she/he really needs.
Watson Beats Humans on Jeopardy – copyright IBM
that since Watson has made such great strides in responding to medical
questions from doctors, that it will soon be the ultimate 24/7 associate—-Spewing answers at midnight and never uttering a word about work-life
balance. Will it really be that easy to teach Watson to conduct legal research in in the next decade?
Research vs Legal Research
I claim no expertise in medical research, I know enough about the evolution of
online medical research systems to suspect that there is at least one
significant difference between medical and legal research. Medical information
has the benefit of having a comparatively standard and nearly universal taxonomy. Symptoms,
diseases, diagnoses, adverse reactions are the same in each state and in each
country. Measles are the same in New York and California.
But the law???? There or is no
standard naming convention across the federal government and the 50 plus
jurisdictions of the United States. Terminology and even the definitions of ordinary words such as
“person” or “homicide” could differ wildly when you cross state lines. Then
there are such unruly concepts as elements, defenses, statutes of limitations,
jurisdictional and procedural issues. And yet we are not done. The
federal government and each of the fifty states have not only enacted laws but they each
have courts which interpret the application of laws.Then there are the administrative agencies
which generate regulations for the federal government and each state – which explain how to comply with those laws. These agencies may have quasi- judicial enforcement arms which
generate even more interpretive materials. I am not even going to mention, municipal laws, county zoning, equity, conflict of laws,international treaties, SRO’s (self regulatory organizations), the ABA or state bar ethics rules…. and I trust my readers will come up with a dozen more sources of laws and compliance which lawyers need to take into consideration.
developed the most sophisticated taxonomy and normalizing framework for US legal research in its topic and key number system which is compiled in the “Analysis of American Law.” Even its
detractors have to admit that it is the closest thing we have to a
taxonomy of US law – and it took over 100 years to develop!
Compiling a “50 state survey” on a single issue used to be a surefire summer project which might take an associate a whole summer to complete! Thankfully the major legal publishers have spent the past decade trying to tame this particular beast. And today… if an associate gets such an assignment and has access to a savvy research professional – they may find that a comparison chart, survey or “smartchart” on their issue can be generated in a matter of seconds using one of the premium legal research services (LexisNexis, Blaw, Westlaw, Wolters Kluwer.) But the development of these charts involved a lot of “heavy lifting” by each publisher. There are still thousands of legal issues which have not yet been tackled by any of the majors.
major legal publishers releases a new topical survey or a new tool for comparing 50 state laws which normalizes and
highlights the differences and commonalities of laws on a single issue across the country.
Watson conduct a research interview?
may get there, but I remain convinced that the biggest challenge for Watson may
be learning to ask the series of contextualizing and narrowing questions
that must follow a simple and common question such as “What is the statute of
limitations for breach of contract?” Can a lawyer accept a google-ized
/wikipeidi-ized generic answer which is not curated to address the specific facts of his
client’s situation? We all know the frustration of hearing this standard Siri refrain “I don’t know ‘mens reä.’ ”
Legal advice requires a higher level of precision than a Jeopardy-style fact based query. This is not a slam dunk.
find some research librarians who have served serious “hard time” at a large
law firm reference desk to run Watson through the paces. If Watson is to master legal research it needs to learn how to ask questions from the pros!