There is palpable skepticism in the law library community regarding Bloomberg’s pricing claims for Bloomberg Law. After all, hadn’t we been promised “flat fee” contracts before? But there was always “a rub” — new content and or new functionality that became the “cash cow” for driving profits for the Lexis and Westlaw. It seemed that no matter how well you negotiated your contract – within a few months there would be new surprises. Content from a 3rd party vendor or a new function link appeared which triggered unanticipated charges.
The legacy of profitability models used by Lexis and Westlaw continually undermined the promises of price predictability
Can the Cycle of Skepticism Be Broken?
Here is the thought pattern: Flat fee contracts lead to increased use. The increased use was then used against the law firm to justify dramatic price increases during he next contract renewal. It is widely believed that the only way to avoid dramatic price increases is to limit use of the “flat fee” contract – thus severely impairing the value of the “flat fee” contract. Why should we believe that Bloomberg will be different?
For a Clue to the Future Look to Bloomberg’s Past
In 1982 Mike Bloomberg developed his first financial terminal with a 10 million dollar severance check from Salomon Brothers.
The first Bloomberg terminal was called Market Master. It was a bond math calculator that sold for $995 for a single license. 30 years and 30,000 functions later a single license increased to $1,655. Bloomberg has had predictable increases of about 6% every two years. Bloomberg says that the price increases are used to improve the workflows, data feed, content and functionality. Today Bloomberg has over 30,000 functions and has poured terabytes of business, legal and government news and financial data into the system and none of it is excluded!
A 2007 Fortune article Bloomberg’s Money Machine described Blooomberg’s ever growing content:
“Bloomberg just kept adding more stuff,” which is like saying the Pilgrims were followed by many more immigrants. From its start in bonds, Bloomberg gradually poured in data and analytics on commodities, equities, foreign securities of all kinds, energy, mortgage-backed securities, derivatives, mutual funds, real estate, hedge funds, foreign exchange. Its oceans of information today include earnings estimates, SEC filings, merger and acquisition facts, legal documents and data on 1.3 million people”
Yes BNA Is Included at No Additional Cost
Bloomberg appears to be staying true to the business model and is including acquisitions both big and small in Bloomberg Law at no additional cost. When they bought Business Week, it was fully integrated. Now Bloomberg is telling subscribers that as soon as all of the BNA material including all newsletters,e.g. the pricey “Daily Report for Executives” and all BNA research platforms such as the Intellectual Property Library are converted, all BNA content — including content not previously subscribed to will be available at no additional cost to the Bloomberg Law subscribers.
Will the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times Be Next
Rumors of Bloomberg’s purchase of the Financial Times have been denied on both sides. Speculation swirls around the competition for access to the Wall Street Journal when the LexisNexis exclusive deal ends in the next 18 to 24 months. . Last week Lex Fenwick, a former Bloomberg CEO became CEO of Dow Jones which owns the Wall Street Journal. One can only assume he and Dan Doctoroff, the current President and CEO of Bloomberg have each other on “speedial.”
Against the Grain not Against the Odds
An April 2011 article in Wall Street Technology entitled “Inside Bloomberg” describes Bloomberg’s response to the recent recession this way: “when most of the industry was hunkering down, slashing costs and laying off workers Bloomberg did what it often does, it tacked the other way and began the biggest period of growth it has ever seen, in terms of employees and product development.” One quarter of Bloomberg’s 12,000 employees are considered research and development staff.
This presents a fairly stark contrast to Bloomberg’s well established rivals. From Westlaw we have seen layoffs and contractions in client support. From Lexis we have seen repeated delays in the rollout of its new Lexis Advance product. Add to this, the recent rumors that both Westlaw and LexisNexis might be sold by their respective owners ThomsonReuters and Reed Elsevier. If you were a “betting man” where would you put your money?
Bloomberg’s Secret Value Strategy.
One of Bloomberg’s strategies on the business terminal side has been to erode dependence on other products. In educating their existing terminal customers on even a few more of the 30,000 functions they hope to wean them off other products. This has been called “Bloomberg Value Solutions.” The strategy isn’t designed to sell you more, but to help you save money.
What would this strategy mean in the legal market?
For the past decade legal information centers have been subscribing to an increasing variety of specialized databases to support finance and securities practices. IP practices require all manner of scientific and technical data. Bloomberg with its deep well of financial data could well pose a value strategy which would eliminate products such as Capital IQ, Mergermarket, Bureau van Dijk, Hoovers. It’s $990 Million acquisition of BNA could offer a “value strategy” aimed at CCH and Law 360. Large firms subscribe to hundreds of specialized newsletters, (covering everything from aviation to zoning). If Bloomberg goes shopping or decides to compete in these specialty areas, this could help firms consolidate the roster of stand-alone products with their attendant raft of specialized headaches including: idiosyncratic licensing, variant publishing formats and password management.
Winning The Terminal Wars
A 1998 article in Investment News described Michael Bloomberg’s 1981 product launch as entering a “field of “napping giants” when he created a new financial service that bore his name and “changed the standard of the industry.”
A 1997 New York Times story “Traders want some Space Too” seemed to be suggesting that Bloomberg’s closed data system would be doomed by the emergence of the internet. To make matters worse, Bloomberg was 3rd entrant into a field dominated by Reuters and Telerate/Dow Jones. How wrong they were! Telerate’s most recent sales are listed at $664M, while Bloomberg’s are estimated to be $7 billion.
Dow Jones and Reuters had hundred year jump on Bloomberg and yet, Bloomberg has thrashed Dow Jones Telerate into insignificance and today Bloomberg rivals Reuters’ share of the financial data market.
Can Bloomberg Have Comparable Success in the Legal market?
See Related Blogposts::
Is Lexis the Next Acquisition for Bloomberg
Bloomberg Get’s BNA’s Intellectual Capital in the Capitol.
Bloomberg Law Takes on the Titans: An Interview With Lou Andriozzi
The Myth and the Madness of Cost Effective Lexis and Westlaw Training