analytics product for securities litigators at event in New York City, which was held at the Park
Avenue Gansevoort Hotel. I had the opportunity to attend today’s event featuring two of Lex Machina’s top executives. Josh Becker, CEO introduced the company and Owen Byrd, Chief
Evangelist and General Counsel, provided an overview of the unique features
offered by the new Lex Machina product. I was asked to provide a “wrap up” commentary on the
evolution of legal research. My comments include a prediction of the
convergence of several technologies around analytics over the next 5 years.
Practice Area Expansion.This launch marks the first new practice area since the initial launch of the IP product in 2011. The development of analytics for new practice areas was driven by access to the massive resources of their parent company LexisNexis. The securities module will be followed by several new modules including: antitrust, commercial, product liability, employment and commercial bankruptcy.
At this morning’s event, Josh Becker traced the company’s
history from not-profit at Stanford Law School into a small company powered by
venture capital, through it’s acquisition. In 2015, LexisNexis purchased Lex Machina for an undisclosed
sum. Lex Machina originally focused exclusively on federal intellectual property
litigation. over the past five years more than have of the Amlaw 100 firms and dozens of corporations have become Lex Machina subscribers. Private firm attorneys and in house counsel have leveraged Lex Machina to analyze data regarding judges, lawyers, parties and litigation history in order to predict behaviors and outcomes.
and fields which are unique to securities litigation. The current data set includes 15,000 securities cases and over 1 million docket entries.
all cases brought under all of the major securities laws (the 33 Act, the 34
Act, Trust Indenture, Investment Company, Investment Advisors, Sarbanes Oxley,
Dodd Frank and several other laws. The product does not include cases brought
under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Action Opt-Out, Government Plaintiff, SEC Enforcement: Settled Complaint, SEC
Enforcement: Contested, Securities Fraud (§ 10(b) / 10b-5) and Shareholder
compensatory damages, Approved Class Action Settlement (Securities).
Violation, Exchange Act Violation, Other
Securities Act Violations, Statute of Limitations Defense, Plaintiff Knowledge
Defense, Cautionary Language / Safe Harbor Defense.
with courts, circuits, judges, companies, lawyers, motion types in order to produce
interactive custom charts and lists which can be used for developing a
litigation strategy or to position a lawyer for a client pitch.
average time to trial, case outcomes, evaluate opposing counsel, understand
settlement rates and win/loss rates for parties and counsel.
Lex Machina’s analytics can serve “double-duty” in both business strategy and litigation strategy. As lawyers compete for a limited pool of corporate clients, analytics can provide powerful insights into law firms as both beauty contest competitors and courtroom adversaries.
Ten years ago, federal litigation data was limited to workload statistics and average time to trial by jurisdiction and judge. And that data was at least a year old! Today Lex Machina provides desktop access to near “real time” data which can be combined with dozens of criteria in infinite permutations. In the new world of litigation analytics lawyers are given the power to ask completely new questions and discover completely new insights. I predict that in 5 years, analytics insights like those offered by Lex Machina, will be viewed as a standard practice tool for lawyers. Lex Machina has the advantage of being the first company to bring analytics to the desktop of litigators. The closest legal analytics competitor is Ravel Law which has a somewhat different focus on the offers analytics focused on “precedential analysis” of judges opinions. As the demand for analytics grows new competitors are sure to follow. But for today, Lex Machina has placed its flag in two practice areas: IP and securities litigation and owns the lead.